COMPLEXITY THEORY OF ART IGOR YEVIN Name: Igor A. Yevin, Physicists, (b. Kazan, Russia, 1949). Address: Department of Biomechanics, Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, Bardina, 4, Moscow, 117334, Russia. E-mail: yevin@online.ru Fields of interests: Theory of complex system, Synergetics.
Publications: Yevin, I. (1993) Synergetics of the Art, [in Russian], Moscow: Lada, 173 pp. Yevin, I. (2000) Ambiguity and art, Visual Mathematics, 2, No. 1, http://members.tripod.com/vismath/ Yevin, I. (2000a) What is Art from Physics Standpoint?, [in Russian], Moscow: Voentechizdat, 144 pp. Yevin, I. (2001) Complexity theory of art: Recent investigations,
InterJournal, http://www.necsi.org
Abstract: It
will be shown that great many artworks, including well-known masterpieces,
exist near critical points or at critical point itself and the main objective
of art is to control these instabilities. Recent experiments revealed that
music tends to lower the degree of chaos in brain waves. One may suggest
that any musical score might be considered as a program of controlling
chaos in the brain. Mathematical models of perception of ambiguous patterns
and ambiguity in art are also discussed. Phase transitions and critical
slowing down in artworks will be described using Hopfield's model of associative
memory and catastrophe theory concepts. Attractor network model of Western
music tonality cognition is proposed. Inverse U-shape relation between
arousal potential and hedonic value of artworks is explained by using Ginzburg-Landau
model of phase transition.
1 INSTABILITY IN THE BRAIN AND ART Theory of complex system and synergetics show that brain
is acting close to instability points and therefore exhibits the main features
of self-organization: non-equilibrium phase transition, critical slowing
down, oscillating behavior (Bak, 1996, Haken,
1996, Kelso, 1995). The main objective of this
paper is to show, that great many artworks, including well-known masterpieces,
also exist near critical points or at critical point itself and we can
find in art any features of self-organizing systems near unstable point.
1.1. Control of instability in art Different notions of instability, borrowed from natural sciences, could be applied to different artworks and different kinds of art: Lyapunov instability in choreography and circus, Nash instability in entertaining genres (detectives, adventures), unstable (frustrated) interpersonal relations in plays by W. Shakespeare, etc. Most of these kinds of arts might be considered as an ability to stabilize appropriate unstable states (Yevin, 2000a, Yevin, 2001). Investigations of human EEGs have shown that these signals are deterministic chaotic processes with relatively small number of degree of freedom (no more than 10), which depend on the functional state of the brain (awaking, sleep, and epilepsy; Haken, 1996, Kelso, 1995). In the late 1980s, Hubler and his co-workers carried out a series of studies concerning control of deterministic chaotic systems (Hubler and Lusher, 1989). It turned out, that carefully chosen tiny perturbation could stabilize any of unstable periodic orbits making up a strange attractor. N. Birbaumer and others (1996) revealed
that music tends to lower the degree of chaos in brain waves in that the
dimensional complexity is reduced (see also Patel
and Balaban, 2000). For some epilepsy patients music triggers their
seizures. One can suggest that any musical score might be considered as
a program of controlling chaos in the brain.
1.2. Ambiguity and art Phenomenon ambiguity is the consequence of the profound analogy between pattern recognition and pattern formation in open systems far for equilibrium, discovered by H. Haken (1979). N. Legothetis (1999) recently has shown that resolution of ambiguous pattern is an essential part of the function of the brain, because every pattern, in a way, are ambiguous (in semantic sense, for instance; also see Kruse, 1995). Mathematical models of perception of ambiguous patterns
which describe oscillating behavior is applied to perception ambiguity
in art (ambiguity of smile in Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa, ambiguity
of double meaning comic situations) are described by means catastrophe
theory methods and synergetic model of perception (Yevin,
2000).
2 MODEL OF ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY
Hopfield's model of associative memory and catastrophe theory concepts are used to describe some structural features of artworks. The structure of many artworks is bimodal in itself, that is can be depicted as Hopfield’s potential function with two minims. For instance, acting involves an ability to create the second phase, a "role phase" where the first one is a physiological and psychological nature of the actor. Sculpture art involves an ability to depict representatives of living nature (humans or animals) from materials of inanimate nature (wood, stone, bronze, etc.). The presence of bimodality in art makes possible the existence of various types of phase transitions. The plots of some artworks are based on the idea of animated statue, where the phase transition "inanimate-animated" takes place (opera Don Giovanni by Mozart, poems Copper Horseman and Stone Guest by Pushkin). Just as like bimodality of sculptural art begets plots about animated statue, bimodality of actor art gives a possibility to use a phase transition called "character invasion" for plot development (Neuringer, 1995, Yevin, 1997). The main character of the movie A Double Life is an actor who plays the role of Othello for so long time that it begins to affect to his psychic activity, making him more and more jealous of his beloved and, like the stage character, he strangles her and then kills himself. Structure of Western music tonality also one can understand by using Hopfield's neural network model of associative memory. Tonality is a hierarchy of pitch-class. If only one pitch-class is stressed more than others in a piece of music, the music is said to be tonal. If all pitch-classes are treated as equally important, the music is said to be atonal. Almost all familiar melodies are built around a central tone toward which the other tones gravitate and on which the melody usually ends. Three stable steps of tonality: tonic, mediant and dominant are keynotes or attractors of neural network. Others steps of tonality: subdominant, submediant, ascending parenthesis sound, descending parenthesis sound play the role of recognizable patterns, gravitating to some or other keynote. We can depict exactly in Hopfield's potential function
only distances between minims, but not depths of these minims. It is reasonable
to suggest that the minims depth of tonal energetic function is extremely
personal for human beings and reflects a musical abilities (giftedness)
of a person. The more a person has a gift for music, the more depth of
valleys has appropriate energetic function. A person who is devoid of music
ability has energetic function with shallow valleys (Yevin,
2001).
3 THE WUNDT CURVE The relationship between "arousal potential" of artworks
and "hedonic value" well known as Wundt curve (which looks like inverse
U) is explained from the theory of criticality standpoint, more exactly,
the theory of second order phase transition. The "arousal potential" in
this model is the order parameter and "hedonic value" plays the role of
control parameter (like temperature in Ginzburg-Landau model of phase transition).
References Birbaumer,N., Lutzenberger,W., Rau, H., Mayer-Kress,G., and Braun, C. (1996) Perception of music and dimensional complexity of brain activity, International Journal of Bifurcations and Chaos, 6, No. 2, 267-278. Haken, H. (1996) Principles of Brain Functioning, Berlin: Springer, 349 pp. Haken, H. (1979) Pattern Formation by Dynamic Systems and Pattern Recognition, Berlin: Springer, 305 pp. Hubler, A.W., and Lusher, E. (1989) Resonant stimulation and control of nonlinear oscillation, Naturwissenschaft, 76, 67-74. Kelso, J. A. S.( 1995) Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behaviour, Boston: MIT Press, 334 pp. Kruse, P., and Stadler, M., eds. (1995) Ambiguity in Mind and Nature: Multistable Cognitive Phenomena, Berlin: Springer, 354 pp. Logothetis, N. L. (1999) Vision: A window on consciousness, Scientific American, No. 11 [November], 69-74. Neuringer, C. and Willis, R. (1995) The cognitive psychodynamics of acting: Character invasion and director influence, Empirical Studies of the Arts, 13, No. 1, 47-54. Patel, A. and Balaban, E. (2000) Temporal patterns of human cortical activity reflect tone sequence structure, Nature, 403, No. 6773 [2 March]. Yevin, I. (1993) Synergetics of the Art, [in Russian], Moscow: Lada, 173 pp. Yevin, I. (1997) Art as a self-organizing system, Proceedings of International Conference "Mathematics and Art", Moscow-Suzdal, 104-110. Yevin, I. (2000) Ambiguity and art, Visual Mathematics, 2, No. 1, http://members.tripod.com/vismath/ Yevin, I. (2000a) What is Art from Physics Standpoint?, [in Russian], Moscow: Voentechizdat, 144 pp. Yevin, I. (2001) Complexity theory
of art: Recent investigations, InterJournal, http://www.necsi.org
|